By Lawrence Hamtil
Going back to December of 1970 (the earliest for which I can find data), the Wilshire 5000 total return index has posted 10.65% annualized returns (through April of this year), versus 10.4% for the MSCI Europe total return index. Given the fairly similar annual performances of the indices, one would be tempted to think that they have tracked relatively similar paths along the way to achieving those returns.
However, a look at the relative rolling 10-year performances for the two indices reveals long cycles of fairly dramatic relative over- and underperformance, with the current period of European underperformance being the worst on record:
With Europe looking relatively cheap compared to the U.S., its markets are attracting the attention of many asset allocators. However, just because something is cheap is not necessarily a catalyst in itself for outperformance; it is simply a bet on mean-reversion. That being said, what factors might it take for Europe’s next cycle of outperformance relative to the U.S.?
Perhaps the U.S. market, which is currently dominated by technology shares, might suffer as tech falls out favor, similar to what happened in the wake of the tech boom and bust in the late 1990s – early 2000s, which, coincidentally, was the beginning of Europe’s last cycle of outperformance relative to the U.S.
Another factor might be the return of health to Europe’s banking sector, which is the largest weighting in the MSCI Europe index. Given the trouble in the banks of nations like Italy and, to a lesser extent, Germany, this seems unlikely.
The easiest case to make for Europe’s resurgence, in my opinion, is another weak-dollar cycle. Tracking the relative performance of the two indices – this time using 3-year rolling averages – when plotted against 3-year changes in the U.S. dollar shows how important changes in the value of the dollar is to U.S. vs foreign equity performance:
