Oil Slumps As Saudis “Won’t Change” Policy, Russia Rethinks 2016 Price Forecast

On Tuesday, we took a close look at the forecast for the Russian economy given various assumptions about the price of oil in 2016. 

While Russia has thus far managed to weather the crude storm relatively well (indeed, Moscow is now pumping more crude than ever before and expects oil exports to rise for the first time in six years in 2015), the numbers do not lie.

The ruble is plunging in the face of the oil price slump and if prices hit $30/bbl, the country’s budget deficit is expected to balloon from 3% of GDP to some 4.4% – that would be the second largest deficit in two decades. Indeed, the Russian central bank itself says that in an adverse scenario wherein oil trades at $35/bbl in 2016, GDP will contract by 5% and inflation will run at 7-9%. Say what you will about the country’s penchant for resilience, but that isn’t a pretty picture. The rumored return of former FinMin Alexei Kudrin to the government is evidence of Moscow’s attempts to find a solution sooner rather than later.

The interesting thing about Russia’s budget for 2016 is that it’s based on oil prices of $50/bbl. It’s not entirely clear how realistic that is. 

For instance, the Saudis are likely basing their 2016 budget on considerably lower prices.

As we outlined in great detail earlier this week, Riyadh is expected to run a 13% deficit in 2016. That’s actually in line with expectations and comes on the heels of a better than expected 2015 when the red ink somewhat inexplicably came in at between 15% and 16% of GDP as opposed to the 20% the market was expecting. That’s bad news for prices as it means the Saudis are holding up better than most observers anticipated. Riyadh can thus continue its war of attrition with the US shale complex for longer.

Also, remember that Saudi Arabia came into 2015 with virtually no debt, which means they can borrow to offset the SAMA burn. At $30/bbl, Saudi Arabia could hold out for nearly two years with no subsidy cuts and more than 3 years as long as they finance 50% of spending in the debt market. Now that the subsidy cuts are a reality, those figures rise materially:

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Author: Travis Esquivel

Travis Esquivel is an engineer, passionate soccer player and full-time dad. He enjoys writing about innovation and technology from time to time.

Share This Post On

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *